Page 1 |
Previous | 1 of 2 | Next |
|
This page
All
Subset |
Bulletin HASKINS & SELLS 107
THE present Michigan law governing
corporations, as amended under Act 267
of the 1929 law, now contains certain provisions
which are likely to cause difficulty
of interpretation and application when
questions affecting surplus and dividends
arise.
The law now attempts to define surplus
in the following terms:
"The excess, if any, at any given time,
of the total net assets of the corporation
over the amount so determined to be capital
shall be surplus available for all purposes
for which surplus earnings may
properly be applied."
From this, surplus earnings usually being
subject to appropriation for dividends, one
may reason that any excess of net assets
over stated capital may be appropriated
for dividends. If this conclusion is correct,
any surplus, regardless of how derived,
may be so treated. This would
apply to capital surplus of any kind, not
omitting that so-called capital surplus
which sometimes is said to result from
appraisals.
In further respects the present law has
been changed to permit of greater latitude
in the treatment of capital. Boards of
directors now may determine, as in Delaware
corporations, that only a part of the
consideration received for capital stock
shall be capital. But, as in Ohio corporations,
the determination must be made at
the time of issuance, if cash is the consideration,
or within sixty days after the
issuance, if the consideration is property,
or partly cash and partly property. The
limitation of time imposed upon corporations
which had issued capital stock prior
to the date on which the amendment became
effective, was fixed at July 1, 1930.
Out of the new law one may read such
provisions as that capital stock without
par value may not be issued except for
some consideration. The consideration
may be that which is prescribed in the
articles of incorporation, or the fair market
value as fixed by the directors, whose
judgment in the absence of fraud is conclusive,
or such consideration as shall be
consented to by two-thirds of the shareholders
of each class of stock outstanding.
Again, one discovers that premium on
shares having a par value may be treated
as surplus available for dividends. This is
by reason of the passage which reads:
"* * * unless all the shares issued shall
Michigan Corporation Law
Object Description
| Title |
Michigan corporation law |
| Author |
Anonymous |
| Subject |
Corporations -- Michigan -- Law and legislation Surplus (Accounting) Dividends |
| Citation |
Haskins & Sells Bulletin, Vol. 13, no. 04 (1930 October), p. 107-108 |
| Date-Issued | 1930 |
| Source | Originally published by: Haskins & Sells |
| Type | Text |
| Collection | Deloitte Digital Collection |
| Digital Publisher | University of Mississippi Libraries. Accounting Collection |
| Date-Digitally Created | 2009 |
| Identifier | hs bulletin 13-p107 |
